Closed Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
04-01-2010, 02:14 PM #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Grand Junction, Co.
- Posts
- 2
Peer-review my encryption methodology?
Hi - I am Ron, and my interest is writing alternate encryption methods. I thought this might be a good place to get come comments on my methodology - sort of a peer review.
I think DES and AES are unintuitive and just messy and my attempt is to use simple procedures that can be combined to produce Cryptographically Secure (CS) encryption procedures.
I have written a subroutine library that I think is very powerful and can allow almost anyone to write their own powerful encryption code. I am not asking for a critique of the code, but an analysis of the ideas. I subset I can write unbreakable code (55,000 bit encryption) with keys each as long as 4,000 UTF-8 bytes (keyboard of text file content was the idea.)
Is this the right place? Here is a teaser...
[url]http://rascalcode.home.bresnan.net/case.html[/url]
Ron.
-
04-01-2010, 08:45 PM #2
Moderator
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 891
try here. [url]http://triviasecurity.net/boards/index.php/board,25.0.html[/url]
-
04-01-2010, 10:08 PM #3
Registered User
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Grand Junction, Co.
- Posts
- 2
Thanks. I'll give.em a try.
-
04-09-2010, 01:27 AM #4
Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Posts
- 3
By going to the ridiculous extreme of 55,000 bit encryption I thought it was clear that remaining in a "256-bit" world was a little old-hat. I was trying to expand thinking to something beyond that by demonstrating that you could achieve good encryption in other ways - more simple ways than AES.
I thought that it might be a good idea to expand ideas a bit. I know prof's have lesson plans worked out on AES SPNs. I just wonder if surrendering your ability to think is in the best interests of the future. I suggest that progress is not made by followers, or those who defend the Status Quo.
.......................................................................................Last edited by gordo; 04-19-2010 at 06:20 AM.
-
04-19-2010, 05:46 AM #5sasi12 Guest
A formula used to turn ordinary data, or "plaintext," into a secret code known as "ciphertext." Each algorithm uses a string of bits known as a "key" to perform the calculations. The larger the key (the more bits), the greater the number of potential patterns can be created, thus making it harder to break the code and descramble the contents.
Most encryption algorithms use the block cipher method, which codes fixed blocks of input that are typically from 64 to 128 bits in length. Some use the stream method, which works with the continuous stream of input.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[uLast edited by gordo; 04-19-2010 at 06:21 AM.
-
04-24-2010, 06:25 AM #6seri Guest
The dialog box below from the ScramDisk encryption program shows the various algorithms offered to encrypt data on your hard disk. The free, open source, legacy version of ScramDisk is available at [url]www.samsimpson.com[/url]. The accompanying descriptions and performance comparisons from the ScramDisk documentation manual are provided because they provide a brief and clear summary of current-day secret key encryption algorithms.
....................................................................
[url=http://kratom.org]kratom[/url]
[url=http://www.smartlipotopdocs.com/]Smart Lipo[/url]
-
05-06-2010, 06:16 AM #7
Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Posts
- 7
RE : Peer-review my encryption methodology?
Hi,
Thanks you provide great information and best way to explain it.
Thanks
Eddie wilson
-
05-12-2010, 11:39 AM #8
Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 6
Peer review my encryption methodology
File-Sharing Solicitors Under Investigation
wow.. this has been long overdue
-
05-13-2010, 06:17 AM #9
Registered User
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Posts
- 3
[url=http://www.r4ikarte.de/]m3 real karte[/url]



