the passwords "pro" and it is detected by all AVs, worthless. thas *.* ProRat with a trojan in it. =)
the passwords "pro" and it is detected by all AVs, worthless. thas *.* ProRat with a trojan in it. =)
~All I wanna do is piss people off.
its also weird, when i scanned the zip on virusscan it found nothing.
Service load:
0% *00%
File: Prorat_2.0_SE.zip
Status:
POSSIBLY INFECTED/MALWARE (Note: this file was only classified as malware by scanners known to generate more false positives than the average scanner. Do not consider these results definately accurate. Also, because of this, results of this scan will not be recorded in the database.)
MD5 a8fafb4c2*5a20ad4*80eedabf5a8*2c
Packers detected:
-
Scanner results
AntiVir
Found nothing
ArcaVir
Found nothing
Avast
Found nothing
AVG Antivirus
Found nothing
BitDefender
Found nothing
ClamAV
Found nothing
Dr.Web
Found nothing
F-Prot Antivirus
Found suspicious file (encrypted program in archive)
F-Secure Anti-Virus
Found nothing
Fortinet
Found nothing
Kaspersky Anti-Virus
Found nothing
NOD*2
Found nothing
Norman Virus Control
Found nothing
VirusBuster
Found nothing
VBA*2
Found nothing
~All I wanna do is piss people off.
soo is this prorat *.* SE or just the public version.. also, did they backdoor it with a trojen or wut.. im confused?
its *.*se and i dunno if its backdoored or not im pretty sure it is but im not taking the risk of opening it up.
~All I wanna do is piss people off.
yes do not open it,if you want prorat*.* se with not backdoors,sign up at ssgroup.org and download it there,ssgroup is a very nice site dedicated to remote administration tools,i am always there and everyone there is very friendly and willing to help
the reason it cant find anything when you scan the zip is because the zip has a password,your av cant even access them since its password protected,you would have to extract the files and then scanOriginally Posted by Whitecrow
@norton 2k6-read my post right before yours to get prorat full version,also dont use norton,its the worst av ever created,
If a malware-containing archive is spread enough, it will be included in antivirus definitions as well as the actual files - it's better to catch the programs before they have a chance to even be extracted. Executables aren't the only thing they detect.Originally Posted by squidderuds
.... its not possible to scan archives with passwords,its just like seeing whats in a house when the door is locked
Yeah, but if the actual zip file itself is included in signatures there is no need to look inside it. That's my point.Originally Posted by squidderuds
wow im sorry but you are *00 percent wrong,avs cant even see whats in it,so how could they tag it,if its password protected avs have no idea whats inside it,therefor they dont tag it,not sure why you think that